Greenies vs. scientists

Good Job GREENPEACE !!!

I usually don't agree with some aggressive Greenpeace tactics.

Also Science contradicts many irrational Greenpeace proposals like:

- CFL lamps: if we consider the whole lifecycle from material extraction to disposal or recycling and not just home usage, they result in increased energy and materials consumption, gas emissions and pollution. 

- Renewable energy: it's uneconomic and eco-unfriendly (again, never measured full lifecycle impact).

- Protection of private forestland (which means forced collectivization) while not letting species replacement with the emissions advantages of youg woods.
- Amazon: missed the point that old jungle emissions are not good for their models 

and many etc. which end up harming the environment instead of helping it. That's why Greenpeace should be called greenwar.

Reality also contradicts Greenpeace anti-human vs pro-animal-vegetable approach to population growth:

http://popbombs.blogspot.com/2011/12/pop-bombs-defused.html

But this time I’m glad to say CHAPEAU to Greenpeace !

Europe has finally recognized what genetic science always stated: the embryo is a living human living, with human rights:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/press/releases/Greenpeace-welcomes-European-Court-of-Justice-ruling-on-stem-cells-patents/

Now, when will Greenpeace start acting against abortifacient contraceptives?

Did you know that ALL contraceptives (except barriers) are abortifacient?
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kah/kah_03howpillworks1.html

By the way, did you know hormonal contraceptives end in water contamination and hormonally affect animals and fish?
It's better to use natural family planning which respects nature, the human nature and above all, does not kill the unborn children.

By the way, don't forget about the Global Warming Swindle
http://green-religion.blogspot.com/2011/12/global-warming-mythology.html

Remember the CFC psychosis on the ozone layer? This is getting worse. And it will cost us billions of dollars, jobs, health plans, education, etc.

Before it was the commies. Now, the greenies are comin!

Why?
http://green-religion.blogspot.com/2011/12/atheism-is-pesimism.html

Atheism means pesimism

 †

JMJ

Pax

Man is religious by nature. 

We are all born with a conscience, an inner "voice" which tells us what is right or wrong (nothing in between). This voice is a proof that before birth we are all exposed to Truth: we distinguish between true or false by comparing to that standard. Unfortunately, sin deforms conscience and obscures our capacity to recognize Truth.

If man betrays Truth, he has to fill the vacuum with some ideology. Otherwise he can't fulfill his need to transcend death. That's why some are taking environmentalism as a religious substitute and why so many atheists choose to become scientists: scientism (or any other ism and sin) becomes their personal man made "god".

For relativism all religions are equal just as fairy tales or myths. That's why for some legal systems like in the USA, religion means whatever you believe in:
"a sincere and meaningful belief that occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to the place held by God in the lives of other persons. The religion or religious concept need not include belief in the existence of God or a supreme being to be within the scope of the First Amendment."
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Religion 

Check the green "religion":
http://www.green-agenda.com/unitedfaith.html 

According to that wrong definition, current non-scientific environmentalism, could be considered a cult/church/religion and they shouldn't mess with the educational system with their wrong beliefs.

No matter what the US Supreme Court says, there is only one Truth, ergo only one true religion, with the real power to re-attach people with God (the literal meaning of the word re-ligare). Since ideologies depart from an idea and not reality, they crash against the Rock of Truth, Jesus.

Scientific Proof of Religion:

http://prove-religion.blogspot.com/2011/12/scientific-proof-of-religion.html

If we shut our eyes,

we are the blindest of blinds.

If non-Catholics acknowledge those scientific facts, it doesn't mean they have wasted their lives in wrong beliefs, as long as they had been faithful to truth, good, love and conscience. Nevertheless, after watching the unquestionable evidence, they will be judged for not accepting it. Some are so proud and stubborn, that they are willing to waste the rest of their lives, just to postpone recognizing a mistake. On judgement day, they will have no choice but to admit how wrong they were. Too late to repent!

It's no surprise that non-belivers are pesimistic about the future:
they are clueless about Divine Providence and the role of Angels in nature!

God is Hope, 
the true Hope, 

Abandon God,
abandon hope.
Sin leaves men without hope.

To recover hope, recover God.

The further away mankind goes from God's plan, the darker it will get. 

The 21st century is the darkest of ages. 

". . . if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will never have seen before. Fire will fall from the sky and will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well as the bad, sparing neither priests nor faithful. The survivors will find themselves so desolate that they will envy the dead. The only arms which will remain for you will be the Rosary and the Sign left by my Son. Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. With the Rosary, pray for the Pope, the bishops and the priests."

http://www.theworkofgod.org/Aparitns/Akita.htm

Cheer up! After the fire from the sky (ca. 2040), the Son will shine again for the thousand years kingdom of Christ!

AMDG